引言: 為什麼要民族、民權、民生

版主: admin1

回覆文章
admin
Site Admin
文章: 513
註冊時間: 2020-07-10, 20:00
點讚了: 32 次
被點讚了: 9 次

引言: 為什麼要民族、民權、民生

文章 admin »

孫中山信奉三民主義(民族、民權、民生),'民生'亦在傾出彩虹多處討論,而民主是現代社會持別是西方社會標榜核心價值,亦是現在中國社會主義16個核心價值之一,所以我們在這裡要談的民權也包括民主。
超民主.JPG
超民主.JPG (212.38 KiB) 已瀏覽 677 次
超民主 2.JPG
超民主 2.JPG (150.87 KiB) 已瀏覽 677 次

Tseung
Site Admin
文章: 600
註冊時間: 2020-07-12, 04:47
點讚了: 17 次
被點讚了: 14 次

Re: 民主、民族、民權

文章 Tseung »

One question was: How is Super Democracy different from the present Western Democracy?

1. In the past, without Internet, citizens rely on Elected Representatives to represent them to vote on Government Policies.
2. With Internet, Voters can comment and discuss the policies via the discussion forums. They can see comments from other citizens.
3. When appropriate, some policy decisions can be done via Internet Voting. Others can still be decided by Elected Representatives.

Tseung
Site Admin
文章: 600
註冊時間: 2020-07-12, 04:47
點讚了: 17 次
被點讚了: 14 次

Re: 民主、民族、民權

文章 Tseung »

Super Democracy

The present Western Democracy has faults that must be corrected. The Western Democracy emphasized one person one vote. It assumes that voters are educated and rational. The multi-party system allows the voters to make a choice. Even if they make a wrong choice, the damage will be limited to 4 years.

The recent 2020 Election in USA showed that the present democratic system could elect someone totally unqualified as President. Donald Trump abused Power. He made USA withdrew from established treaties such as Paris Convention on Climate Change; Nuclear Agreement with Iran; the World Health Organization; etc.

He refused to accept defeat in Election. He incited his supporters (rational?) to besiege Capitol Hill. Western Democracy lost its shrine. Western Democracy already suffered from the Party Politics and lack of efficiency and long term planning. Should its faults be corrected?

Super Democracy tries to correct such faults. Super Democracy uses the Multi-tier power of Internet to:
(1) Allow voters to first express their views via special internet forums; see and comment on the views of others. (First tier)
(2) Politicians or future politicians can express their views in greater depth via the Second tier Internet Forums. That can serve as a training ground and a promotion platform.
(3) Political Parties can gather more supporters who share their political views.
(4) All Voters must pass a basic test to ensure that they understand the fundamental rules in a Democracy. (It is similar to ensuring every driver know the rules of the road.) Politicians must take a more in-depth test to ensure that they are qualified.
(5) The Third tier will be reserved for the candidates competing for important positions or Presidency.
(6) Voters do not need to rely totally on the elected representatives as they can easily vote via the Internet on important issues.

lion
文章: 31
註冊時間: 2020-07-11, 15:58
點讚了: 3 次
被點讚了: 4 次

Re: Democracy, Ethnicity, Civil Rights

文章 lion »

Any system must be appropriate for the actual environment. For a Nation with little Internet access, Internet Forum is not practical.

China is rising fast with the present system. Plan but do not change for the sake of change.

回覆文章

回到「民族、民權、民生及民主」